2 months ago
ZombieMonta
5 comments
0 recs |
Email
PrintComments
That graphic is truly awful.
The points for/points against shouldn’t be on the same line — they’re almost impossible to compare with the eye in the state they’re in. New Orleans appears vastly superior to Indianapolis at first glance because their “points for” are so much higher, but the overall ratio of the two is lower than Indy’s, and the graphic should relay that information.
by jwiscarson on Nov 13, 2009 3:10 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Sad
This gives the MLB a good reason to not produce a salary cap, the NFL has one and there isn’t too much parity.
I now have a blog: http://justanotherbaltimoresportsblog.blogspot.com/
by BaltimoreSportsFan on Nov 13, 2009 3:30 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Not as bad as it looks, I think
Those are hardly huge markets in the winners column and I imagine it’s easier to sell that well-run teams can win year to year consistently under a salary cap than no matter how well (or poorly) you run your team, you can’t break away from the pack.
Sign Corky Miller
by TheJay on Nov 13, 2009 10:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Rams, Browns, and Raiders
All have an outside chance at the fewest points in a 16-game season, don’t they?
Sign Corky Miller
by TheJay on Nov 13, 2009 10:06 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I think it’s telling that the Broncos are the only winning team that doesn’t have a glaring disparity between points and points allowed.
Inhistoric.com -- the No. 1 source for sports history.
by ZombieMonta on Nov 14, 2009 1:40 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
This is Inhistoric, the ultimate resource in what happened on this day in sports history. To find out all you need to know about the site, click here for the FAQ.
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
