Inhistoric: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Anonymous Eagle covering Marquette!

Rams, Bucs, Browns, Chiefs: could any lose 20 straight?

The longest losing streak of all time is 26 games, set by the atrocious Tampa Bay Buccaneers of the 1970's. The Detroit Lions saw their losing streak stop at 19 games earlier this year, keeping them from becoming just the second team to ever lose 20 straight.

If you were looking to see history this year, you may still be in luck. There are four teams carrying at least eight-game losing streaks, and all four appear to have at least a marginal shot at breaking 20. But which team, if any, is bad enough to make it happen?

8f39f95f484cce98a87df6da985bc75c-getty-88971951dv024_greenbay_mediumTeam 1: St. Louis Rams

Losing streak: 14

Next six games:

  • vs. Minnesota
  • @ Jacksonville
  • vs. Indianapolis
  • @ Detroit
  • vs. New Orleans
  • vs. Arizona

It doesn't look good for the St. Louis Rams, whose one bright spot this season has been their 9-7 loss to the Washington Redskins. It's possible they could surprise the Vikings, who might be due for a letdown after their huge game against the Packers -- but I doubt it. The Jaguars are looking real good at 2-2 and should have no trouble silencing the Rams. They ain't beating the Colts. They COULD beat the Lions, but they'd be on the road. They ain't beating the Saints, and they haven't beaten the Cardinals since September 24, 2006.

Prognosis for losing 20: Probable. (If you're in St. Louis, just trade in your Rams' seats for Cardinals tickets. Save yourself the misery.)

Star-divide

41f8f37cb7e1594816363ab538c37ebf-getty-88971942lf037_brown_raven_mediumTeam 2: Cleveland Browns

Losing streak: 10

Next ten games:

  • @ Buffalo
  • @ Pittsburgh
  • vs. Green Bay
  • @ Chicago
  • vs. Baltimore
  • @ Detroit
  • @ Cincinnati
  • vs. San Diego
  • vs. Pittsburgh
  • @ Kansas City

Not only have the Cleveland Browns lost ten consecutive games, they have only produced three offensive touchdowns during that time -- an all-time NFL low. If you're a Browns fan, then you know that not only do the Browns lose regularly to teams with great defenses like San Diego, Pittsburgh, Baltimore, Green Bay, and Chicago, they get destroyed by them. Buffalo, Kansas City, and Detroit are all beatable, but they'd have to get it done on the road.

Prognosis for losing 20: Possible, but unlikely. (They suck, but the odds of them losing to both Kansas City AND Detroit is still a longshot. If you're in Cleveland, bet it all on the Cavs if you know what's good for you.)

1ad3a702447b69b30b25331a586400cc-getty-88971944jm034_new_york_gian_mediumTeam 3: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Losing streak: 8

Next dozen games:

  • @ Philadelphia
  • vs. Carolina
  • vs. New England
  • vs. Green Bay
  • @ Miami
  • vs. New Orleans
  • @ Atlanta
  • @ Carolina
  • vs. NY Jets
  • @ Seattle
  • @ New Orleans
  • vs. Atlanta

For the Bucs to lose 20 straight, it would mean they'd have to go 0-16, which is why they probably aren't going to do it... probably. They play Carolina twice, the Dolphins once, the Seahawks once and the Falcons on the last day of the year -- when Atlanta might be resting their starters. That being said, they have no quarterback and they have no offense to speak of, whatsoever. The last time they had a rusher go for 100 yards was when Warrick Dunn did it... 15 games ago. So rest assured, this team is awful.

Prognosis for losing 20: Nah. (Their schedule has enough holes, and their defence is decent enough that they should squeak out at least one victory.)

03a2cd14f831b23fa6859d14534abd29-getty-88971977js025_new_york_gian_mediumTeam 4: Kansas City Chiefs

Losing streak: 8

Next dozen games:

  • vs. Dallas
  • @ Washington
  • vs. San Diego
  • @ Jacksonville
  • @ Oakland
  • vs. Pittsburgh
  • @ San Diego
  • vs. Denver
  • vs. Buffalo
  • vs. Cleveland
  • @ Cincinnati
  • @ Denver

The Chiefs have lost 27 of their last 29 games. 2-27! So I'm not going to give them the benefit of the doubt when it comes to getting an easy win. That being said, they have a REALLY easy schedule. Washington, Oakland, Cincinnati, Denver, Cleveland, and Buffalo are bound to give them at least one win. Surely Larry Johnson and Matt Cassell can't play this bad all season long.

Prognosis for losing 20: Don't see it. (They'll get it done against one of their divisional opponents. If not, expect to see more bagheads in Kansas City.)

(Photos by Dilip Vishwanat, Larry French, J. Meric, and Jamie Squire, all courtesy of Getty Images)

0 recs  |  Comment 4 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

How many for STL

The Rams do look to be the best choice, but i am curious to see if they could extend that their streak if they lose to Detroit.

by Jeremy Mauss on Oct 6, 2009 4:47 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

This is an awesome blog!

Ray Rice is so agile. He's a whole new breed for agile you need a new word to describe his agility... UBER-AGILITY!

by BaltimoreSportsFan on Oct 6, 2009 4:48 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Ever since the Lions went 0-16 (which I thought was impossible for an established team) I’m starting to think every bad 0-4 team is going 0-16. I know this isn’t going to happen, but just an irrational thought I get.

I think the Rams will lose 20, but the I don’t think Cinci is bad this year (as you implied with the Chiefs). Cinci might sneak into the playoffs. There- I said it.

by Jsz on Oct 7, 2009 4:45 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

the Dolphins were dangerously close to 0-16 two years ago

they won an OT game on (as I remember it) a blown coverage slant pass that turned into a long TD vs. a Ravens team that finished 3-13, and they finished the season 1-15. Funny, it seems like there’s so much parity in the NFL, yet there are some truly astonishingly awful teams.

Last year I actually thought the Rams were worse than the Lions – I still don’t know how they won those 2 games. So it wouldn’t surprise me at all if they not only lost 20 straight, but if they went 0-16 and took down the Bucs record for futility. Marshall Faulk and Kurt Warner seem like a looooong time ago.

"[The Giants] beat us down. We were beat by a grown-man team, a team we want to be like one day. They came in here and took it to us. Out-manned us, out-gunned us. ... It wasn't even close." - Raheem Morris, 9/27/09

by cjmulrain on Oct 7, 2009 7:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

This is Inhistoric, the ultimate resource in what happened on this day in sports history. To find out all you need to know about the site, click here for the FAQ.

Start posting on Inhistoric »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Doc-octavio_small
The Members of the 2010 Pro Football Hall of Fame
08-_the_author_small
Reggie Jackson's Summer of '69
08-_the_author_small
Celebrating the 1910 Philadelphia Athletics
08-_the_author_small
Campy: More than Just a Bat Slinger
Small
Mark McGwire Starting to Use Steroids in 1989

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

PORTLAND, OR - NOVEMBER 25: Brook Lopez #11, Devin Harris #34 and Sean Williams #51 of the New Jersey Nets watch their team lag behind during a game against the Portland Trail Blazers on November 25, 2009 at the Rose Garden Arena in Portland, Oregon. (Photo by Sam Forencich/NBAE via Getty Images)

What's More Valuable: Owner's Money, Or A Money Player?

lance mackey dogs via http://twitpic.com/190zq5 +15 updates

Lance Mackey Makes History, Wins Record Fourth-Consecutive Iditarod

Pittsburgh Penguins'  Hal Gill, center, holds his daughter Isabella as she pets a police horse following a parade celebrating the team's Stanley Cup win Monday, June 15, 2009, in downtown Pittsburgh. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar) link

It's Never Too Early For The Derby: Handicapping The Early Field

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Slam_small ZombieMonta